↓ Skip to main content

The brain’s Geppetto—microbes as puppeteers of neural function and behaviour?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroVirology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 1,020)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
The brain’s Geppetto—microbes as puppeteers of neural function and behaviour?
Published in
Journal of NeuroVirology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13365-015-0355-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roman M. Stilling, Timothy G. Dinan, John F. Cryan

Abstract

Research on the microbiome and its interaction with various host organs, including the brain, is increasingly gaining momentum. With more evidence establishing a comprehensive microbiota-gut-brain axis, questions have been raised as to the extent to which microbes influence brain physiology and behaviour. In parallel, there is a growing literature showing active behavioural manipulation in favour of the microbe for certain parasites. However, it seems unclear where the hidden majority of microbes are localised on the parasitism-mutualism spectrum. A long evolutionary history intimately connects host and microbiota, which complicates this classification. In this conceptual minireview, we discuss current hypotheses on host-microbe interaction and argue that novel experimental approaches and theoretical concepts, such as the hologenome theory, are necessary to incorporate transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of the microbiome into evolutionary theories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Master 14 10%
Other 13 9%
Other 34 25%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 12%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Psychology 7 5%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,878,375
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroVirology
#31
of 1,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,192
of 281,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroVirology
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,020 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.