↓ Skip to main content

Characterizations of Solution Sets of Differentiable Quasiconvex Programming Problems

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Optimization Theory & Applications, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
Title
Characterizations of Solution Sets of Differentiable Quasiconvex Programming Problems
Published in
Journal of Optimization Theory & Applications, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10957-018-1379-1
Authors

Vsevolod I. Ivanov

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2018.
All research outputs
#10,312,924
of 12,923,750 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Optimization Theory & Applications
#124
of 164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,188
of 269,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Optimization Theory & Applications
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,923,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.