| Title |
Daphnia magna as a test animal in acute and chronic toxicity tests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hydrobiologia, June 1978
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00020773 |
| Authors |
D. M. M. Adema |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 45 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2015.
All research outputs
#3,241,203
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#5
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265
of 5,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them