| Title |
Underestimated role of legume roots for soil N fertility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13593-015-0297-y |
| Authors |
Corina Carranca, Maria O. Torres, Manuel Madeira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Ghana | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 23% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2015.
All research outputs
#5,884,468
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#479
of 703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,913
of 262,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.