↓ Skip to main content

Offense seriousness scaling: An alternative to scenario methods

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Quantitative Criminology, September 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Offense seriousness scaling: An alternative to scenario methods
Published in
Journal of Quantitative Criminology, September 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf01064464
Authors

James P. Lynch, Mona J. E. Danner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 40%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#282
of 529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,819
of 20,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.