2,473 followers
RT @DavidDeutschOxf: @ABrodutch @skdh @quantum_graeme I can't find a good lecture about this on video. Presumably (judging by the title and…
118,772 followers
@ABrodutch @skdh @quantum_graeme I can't find a good lecture about this on video. Presumably (judging by the title and the authors!) the content is in this paper by Brown and Wallace: https://t.co/UKKeFRt52u
172 followers
RT @Sam_kuyp: See also Brown and Wallace’s excellent paper ‘Solving the measurement problem: de Broglie-Bohm loses out to Everett’. https:…
2,270 followers
@Sam_kuyp Check out the abstract! https://t.co/USwdGwP3RQ
3,593 followers
See also Brown and Wallace’s excellent paper ‘Solving the measurement problem: de Broglie-Bohm loses out to Everett’. https://t.co/WejSzObm1D
2,270 followers
@yungneocon @interpretantion @pp0196 Check out the abstract! https://t.co/USwdGwxstg
9,822 followers
@interpretantion @pp0196 Here’s a more targeted technical criticism that quickly gets beyond my knowledge or specialty but anyway https://t.co/PvI4BkV68S https://t.co/mbyomN9SwS
1,788 followers
@odo @jm_uria @albaclierta @gisbanos Y este artículo de Harvey Brown y David Wallace argumenta que no es necesario postular más ontología que la función de onda. En particular, dice que no son necesarias las partículas que aparecen en la mecánica cuántica
245 followers
@mattguttmanorg @Crit_Rat Solving the measurement problem: de Broglie-Bohm loses out to Everett https://t.co/TosNsILhF9