@MartinCothran @geoffmprice @ETMoeller And a non-exhaustive list of lulz on the garbage sources you posted, @MartinCothran: 1) Neither UAH nor RSS analyses are "global mean surface temperature anomaly datasets". 2) https://t.co/ivsh4Wt1Og 3) UAH is a lo
@stephen44686214 @Edthedawg @catchyUser @ScottDuncanWX Also, the Newsletter, which isn't peer-reviewed, is generally flawed https://t.co/kinidxgzRK
@LaRosaN66679005 @Carlos_hr_ @leoah8848 @Monica_Garcia_G Ya te he puesto los enlaces de papers que demuestran los fallos de esos papers. El de Mockton es de chiste. Incluso en el mismo número ya lo desmontan, pero ánimo https://t.co/KZSGo0IK6H
@GrahamKirk17 @CSkidmoreUK A former geography professor hired by the Trump administration. His main paper (claiming smaller temperature rises than asserted by the IPCC) has been discredited. https://t.co/nZSWs1q5zJ
@bjames280961 @ScientistsX @NPR @XRebellionUK He has failed to convince his colleagues that his work has merit, e.g. https://t.co/H3ddrEHdwF His credibility is tainted by the people & groups he has associated with: https://t.co/st74SsglW8 See the fol
@MichaelEMann @NOAA @rhersher @joepalca @NPR Legates was also one of the authors – along with Christopher Monckton – of a risible paper claiming that future warming would be minimal that we published a rebuttal to here: https://t.co/pRpuAWU5Pg
@ChrisMartzWX @CColose Thanks, Chris, and here's how that was received by others in the field: https://t.co/LQb5eqG6d5
@JSegor @JohnFehlauer @curryja @EthonRaptor @geoffmprice @hausfath @KHayhoe rebuttal paper to him https://t.co/bs7SyzM9gG
RT @hausfath: @JSegor @curryja @EthonRaptor @geoffmprice @KHayhoe Well, last time Chris managed to get something through peer review (in an…
RT @hausfath: @JSegor @curryja @EthonRaptor @geoffmprice @KHayhoe Well, last time Chris managed to get something through peer review (in an…
@JSegor @curryja @EthonRaptor @geoffmprice @KHayhoe Well, last time Chris managed to get something through peer review (in an obscure Chinese journal) we ended up publishing a rebuttal. Don't really have the bandwidth to respond to every blog post and yout
@Michael77945977 @BettaCharlie @GeraldKutney @TheoFleury14 12/ Further, mainstream climate models simulate global temperature observations much better than the “irreducibly simple climate model” of the deniers. https://t.co/lb5MhlfQDf https://t.co/Uz7JseWe
In the same way that I believe that any paper with Michael Mann’s, Stephan Lewandowsky’s, Naomi Oreskes’s, Phillip Jones and the rest of the Climategate gang need questioning.
@JeffNor50595241 @KeillerDon Fair enough Jeff: I feel the exact same way about Monckton. Which is why any scientific paper with his name on it MUST be questioned. Greg's blog refers to a published paper that debunks one of Monckton's later collaborative
@geoffsmithsmind @JeffNor50595241 @WellthorpeEdna @dennywhite11 @Djdubya3 @KeillerDon Perhaps you missed reading this rejoinder to a later paper by the same 4 authors? https://t.co/6Zz6T3IZPt I'm happy to talk about bias, but the above shows that Monckton
@WeiZhangAtmos @nralbers @GeraldKutney I gave you an answer. Here is another. https://t.co/dxkz8jH1nk
Says the guy that believes in climate models that have a 100% failure rate. 👌
Paper (http://t.co/ZsHZw5YMTi) debunks discredited #climatechange deniers Monckton, Soon's latest silliness. Details: http://t.co/dEfpdZ8z59
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
.@ValidScience (2/2) … Cook et al. http://t.co/rWTrDqt8Sa It is a response to the Moncton, Soon et al. paper about a “simpler model”.
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
RT @hausfath: Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/9wvwUJDL8o
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B
Our response to that silly "models run hot" paper from Monckton et al was just published! http://t.co/ATzWe2H35B