| Title |
Fluid management in critically ill patients: the role of extravascular lung water, abdominal hypertension, capillary leak, and fluid balance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2110-5820-2-s1-s1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colin Cordemans, Inneke De laet, Niels Van Regenmortel, Karen Schoonheydt, Hilde Dits, Wolfgang Huber, Manu LNG Malbrain |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 31% |
| Belgium | 2 | 15% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 8% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Denmark | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 249 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 9% |
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 74 | 29% |
| Unknown | 55 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 158 | 61% |
| Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 59 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,466,525
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#620
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,596
of 179,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.