↓ Skip to main content

Fluid management in critically ill patients: the role of extravascular lung water, abdominal hypertension, capillary leak, and fluid balance

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
Fluid management in critically ill patients: the role of extravascular lung water, abdominal hypertension, capillary leak, and fluid balance
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/2110-5820-2-s1-s1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin Cordemans, Inneke De laet, Niels Van Regenmortel, Karen Schoonheydt, Hilde Dits, Wolfgang Huber, Manu LNG Malbrain

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 207 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 32 15%
Student > Postgraduate 25 12%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 10%
Researcher 19 9%
Other 67 31%
Unknown 28 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 69%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 31 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,106,877
of 20,978,967 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#414
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,504
of 250,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,978,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them