RT @jelena3121: We should not forget that before the US News, Shanghai, THE and the rest came to the scene, *ranking* had been a largely ac…
We should not forget that before the US News, Shanghai, THE and the rest came to the scene, *ranking* had been a largely accepted method of comparing and judging universities and departments—among academics. And it still is. https://t.co/D0VqzVi4Wu
@duncanfransz @LudoWaltman @i4oc_org @InvestInOpen @OSFramework @DORAssessment Then again, are academics dupes to publisher marketing & powerless to managerial manipulation? No. Scholars themselves put metrics like the JIF to work, folding them into th
#ImpactFactor can have some merit when evaluating journals, but not individual research. @SpringerNature https://t.co/vEBMCRcWyi
Accounting for Impact? The Journal *Impact Factor* and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands http://t.co/VXLvCOe61z
Free article! Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research ...... http://t.co/eKrZRLCWFH
Free article! Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research ...... http://t.co/P4ITUz6QlE
'Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands' http://t.co/xTiMS1bTeK #STS
'Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands' http://t.co/xTiMS1bTeK #STS
'Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands' http://t.co/xTiMS1bTeK #STS
Bibliometrics - hero or villain in #biomedical #research? @sarahderijcke #bibliometrics #impactfactor http://t.co/V5qPvaiYx2
Are most debates around #researchers’ uses of the journal #impact factor in #biomedicine folk theories? http://t.co/gVVYaeY7zY #publishing