↓ Skip to main content

Developing an analytical framework for assessing progress toward ecosystem-based management

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Developing an analytical framework for assessing progress toward ecosystem-based management
Published in
Ambio, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-015-0655-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Borgström, Örjan Bodin, Annica Sandström, Beatrice Crona

Abstract

Ecosystem-based management (EBM) has become a key instrument of contemporary environmental policy and practice. Given the increasingly important role of EBM, there is an urgent need for improved analytical approaches to assess if and to what extent EBM has been accomplished in any given case. Drawing on the vast literature on EBM, we identify five key ecosystem aspects for assessment. By linking these aspects to four phases of management, we develop an interdisciplinary, analytical framework that enables a high-resolution and systematic assessment of the degree of specificity and integration of ecosystem aspects in an EBM. We then apply the framework to evaluate five coastal EBM initiatives in Sweden, four on the Baltic coast and one on the west coast. Our results demonstrate our framework's usefulness for in-depth and continuous assessments of processes aiming for EBM, and also provide an empirical basis for inferences about the key challenges for successful EBM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 3 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 124 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 49 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,345,368
of 25,346,731 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#968
of 1,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,696
of 272,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,346,731 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.