| Title |
The Orthanc Ecosystem for Medical Imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10278-018-0082-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sébastien Jodogne |
| Abstract |
This paper reviews the components of Orthanc, a free and open-source, highly versatile ecosystem for medical imaging. At the core of the Orthanc ecosystem, the Orthanc server is a lightweight vendor neutral archive that provides PACS managers with a powerful environment to automate and optimize the imaging flows that are very specific to each hospital. The Orthanc server can be extended with plugins that provide solutions for teleradiology, digital pathology, or enterprise-ready databases. It is shown how software developers and research engineers can easily develop external software or Web portals dealing with medical images, with minimal knowledge of the DICOM standard, thanks to the advanced programming interface of the Orthanc server. The paper concludes by introducing the Stone of Orthanc, an innovative toolkit for the cross-platform rendering of medical images. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Belgium | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 25% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 14 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 15% |
| Engineering | 8 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,731,018
of 24,989,834 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#27
of 1,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,490
of 332,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,989,834 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.