They also read other ancient philosophers; see here: https://t.co/szpukhZI1R
الرابط: https://t.co/OXhS7RIzho
Another dull false dichotomy in my feed : science versus philosophy. At least read this from the physicist @carlorovelli before setting them in opposition to each other https://t.co/uyKzP9HtV4 https://t.co/QqfrAuPiAe
RT @rmaruy: Carlo Rovelli (2018) "Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics"のプレプリント版はこちら。 https://t.co/3fCyWR06Tc
RT @rmaruy: ループ量子重力理論の提唱者の一人として有名なカルロ・ロヴェッリ氏によるオピニオンペーパー。「物理学は哲学を必要とし、哲学は物理学を必要とする」 https://t.co/rt9CNyWbbZ
Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics. By Carlo Rovelli. https://t.co/XtGs9mkRK1 https://t.co/76y0DeBaP9
Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics https://t.co/xkbJlBuS6B
RT @rmaruy: Carlo Rovelli (2018) "Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics"のプレプリント版はこちら。 https://t.co/3fCyWR06Tc
RT @rmaruy: Carlo Rovelli (2018) "Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics"のプレプリント版はこちら。 https://t.co/3fCyWR06Tc
RT @rmaruy: ループ量子重力理論の提唱者の一人として有名なカルロ・ロヴェッリ氏によるオピニオンペーパー。「物理学は哲学を必要とし、哲学は物理学を必要とする」 https://t.co/rt9CNyWbbZ
Carlo Rovelli (2018) "Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics"のプレプリント版はこちら。 https://t.co/3fCyWR06Tc
@Cosmic_Horizons The tide is changing on the perceived role that phil plays in physics. It seems that in many field to “carry on” will require engagement with our previously unstated Phil. From a fellow physicist: https://t.co/ldwuFUpjpZ
@mariePhi1 Some great gateway pieces by @carlorovelli called "Why Physics Needs Philosophy": - Scientific American: https://t.co/9N3I77nNYe - arXiv: https://t.co/Io2CjtFZpD And his talk at the LSE: https://t.co/p5TNZ58uKb
Ce qui me fascine dans les fondements quantiques, c'est que ce domaine met en évidence de façon explicite et clair le lien de parenté entre la philo et la physique. Et que l'un a besoin de l'autre, comme l'écrit si bien Carlo Rovelli : https://t.co/w7xts4R
RT @PhilJaeker: @MannaLiberato "Put the "Ph" back into PhD" https://t.co/Qypm9gYl5V https://t.co/C3qePBYBKi https://t.co/CnZc5BBZuj htt…
RT @PhilJaeker: @MannaLiberato "Put the "Ph" back into PhD" https://t.co/Qypm9gYl5V https://t.co/C3qePBYBKi https://t.co/CnZc5BBZuj htt…
@MannaLiberato "Put the "Ph" back into PhD" https://t.co/Qypm9gYl5V https://t.co/C3qePBYBKi https://t.co/CnZc5BBZuj https://t.co/im045nkh88 https://t.co/FvQZo0rb8A
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
Physics not only needs philosophy--but all the natural sciences, Neuroscience, and psychology as well, to give weight to its theoretical concepts, before we can rely on mathematical solutions without tweaking degrees of freedoms.. https://t.co/J9zg7EDahb
@ManuelMelleLab @JCesarPL @euromenard Y por último “Physics needs philosophy. Philosophy needs physics”: https://t.co/in4TqZR1c1 (5/n)
RT @massimochi: Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics by @carlorovelli https://t.co/dBJ8EXQoLo https://t.co/tg998K5r3s
Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics https://t.co/YCiD9oJTBW
Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics by @carlorovelli https://t.co/dBJ8EXQoLo https://t.co/tg998K5r3s
Her (readworthy) essay reminds of something Carlo Rovelli (@carlorovelli) wrote a while ago (https://t.co/bKZ08yaviz), which contained the following Einstein quote: https://t.co/pcvDpciS4G
RT @rmaruy: カルロ・ロヴェッリ「物理学は哲学を必要とする」(2018) https://t.co/3ThCf1sCYi
RT @rmaruy: カルロ・ロヴェッリ「物理学は哲学を必要とする」(2018) https://t.co/3ThCf1sCYi
RT @rmaruy: ループ量子重力理論の提唱者の一人として有名なカルロ・ロヴェッリ氏によるオピニオンペーパー。「物理学は哲学を必要とし、哲学は物理学を必要とする」 https://t.co/rt9CNyWbbZ
Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics https://t.co/iu7sglt5Tk
RT @rmaruy: ループ量子重力理論の提唱者の一人として有名なカルロ・ロヴェッリ氏によるオピニオンペーパー。「物理学は哲学を必要とし、哲学は物理学を必要とする」 https://t.co/rt9CNyWbbZ
RT @rmaruy: ループ量子重力理論の提唱者の一人として有名なカルロ・ロヴェッリ氏によるオピニオンペーパー。「物理学は哲学を必要とし、哲学は物理学を必要とする」 https://t.co/rt9CNyWbbZ
RT @rmaruy: ループ量子重力理論の提唱者の一人として有名なカルロ・ロヴェッリ氏によるオピニオンペーパー。「物理学は哲学を必要とし、哲学は物理学を必要とする」 https://t.co/rt9CNyWbbZ
RT @rmaruy: カルロ・ロヴェッリ「物理学は哲学を必要とする」(2018) https://t.co/3ThCf1sCYi
RT @rmaruy: カルロ・ロヴェッリ「物理学は哲学を必要とする」(2018) https://t.co/3ThCf1sCYi
カルロ・ロヴェッリ「物理学は哲学を必要とする」(2018) https://t.co/3ThCf1sCYi
@superchiasmatic I wanted to start with @carlorovelli because I've been reading his books and loving the philosophical angle - I love some good phys& phil, and haven't found his kind since Heisenberg! So I started with Physics needs Philosophy, Philoso
El segundo tema que me estoy planteando presentar es un comentario sobre este artículo de Carlo Rovelli acerca de la relación actual entre la filosofía y la física: https://t.co/WktArd9SUT
@carlorovelli defends philosophy against physicists (like Weinberg, Hawking and @neiltyson): 'Physics needs Philosophy. Philosophy needs Physics'. https://t.co/JXuXUw5nDt
RT @rmaruy: ループ量子重力理論の提唱者の一人として有名なカルロ・ロヴェッリ氏によるオピニオンペーパー。「物理学は哲学を必要とし、哲学は物理学を必要とする」 https://t.co/rt9CNyWbbZ
RT @rmaruy: ループ量子重力理論の提唱者の一人として有名なカルロ・ロヴェッリ氏によるオピニオンペーパー。「物理学は哲学を必要とし、哲学は物理学を必要とする」 https://t.co/rt9CNyWbbZ
ループ量子重力理論の提唱者の一人として有名なカルロ・ロヴェッリ氏によるオピニオンペーパー。「物理学は哲学を必要とし、哲学は物理学を必要とする」 https://t.co/rt9CNyWbbZ
"Physics needs Philosophy, Philosophy needs Physics" interesting paper I dug up from @CarloRovelli arguing for using philosophy in bettering the scientific method (for those who take interest in fringe physics) #physics #science https://t.co/szyuVTTd4J
Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics. https://t.co/cFP0UbugHe
Science is not a project with a methodology written in stone. It is our ever evolving endeavour to better understand the world. In the course of its development, it has repeatedly violated its own rules and its own stated methodological assumptions https:/
@ProtonC1 @Oscar_Tagrend Puede que esto ayude en la discusión https://t.co/wieYsfuDbb y si no, al menos aporta una perspectiva interesante.
"The current anti-philosophical ideology has had damaging effects on the fertility of science". By Carlo Rovelli: https://t.co/XUKudfQ7hl
RT @JoaquimNabona: "Sense filosofia no només no pot existir cap ciència, sinó que aquesta es degrada en ofici o si més no en disciplina aux…
RT @JoaquimNabona: "Sense filosofia no només no pot existir cap ciència, sinó que aquesta es degrada en ofici o si més no en disciplina aux…
RT @JoaquimNabona: "Sense filosofia no només no pot existir cap ciència, sinó que aquesta es degrada en ofici o si més no en disciplina aux…
RT @JoaquimNabona: "Sense filosofia no només no pot existir cap ciència, sinó que aquesta es degrada en ofici o si més no en disciplina aux…
RT @JoaquimNabona: "Sense filosofia no només no pot existir cap ciència, sinó que aquesta es degrada en ofici o si més no en disciplina aux…
"Sense filosofia no només no pot existir cap ciència, sinó que aquesta es degrada en ofici o si més no en disciplina auxiliar! Sobre tot però la medicina!" S. Hahnemann. https://t.co/LjQHuniMav https://t.co/HihxYDkoTr https://t.co/uBwU8k5NDg
RT @jeffkoperski: Carlo Rovelli takes on de Grasse Tyson, Hawking, and Weinberg: "Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics" https…
Carlo Rovelli takes on de Grasse Tyson, Hawking, and Weinberg: "Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics" https://t.co/P1I9ORJNIQ
RT @BridgetFalck: A lot of good points in "Physics Needs Philosophy; Philosophy Needs Physics" by Carlo Rovelli. So glad I've been checking…
Ausführliche und sehr gute Zusammenfassung des Artikels von @carlorovelli (https://t.co/5Q06fdg4N9) über Philosophie und Wissenschaft. Ja, beide brauchen einander! Wer sagt, Physik braucht keine Philosophie, macht keine physikalische sondern eine philosoph
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
pair with @carlorovelli on "mountains of useless" physics —> Why Physics Needs Philosophy + vice versa https://t.co/btefi0GcOA https://t.co/gtez4ASUn1
RT @AKvellestad: "Fysikk trenger filosofi. Filosofi trenger fysikk." Carlo Rovelli er ofte vel verdt å lytte til. Her skriver han om viktig…
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
https://t.co/qf3NYplvU3 An interesting paper by @carlorovelli on the anti-philosophical ideology in the physics community and its damaging effects on the fertility of science.
"Fysikk trenger filosofi. Filosofi trenger fysikk." Carlo Rovelli er ofte vel verdt å lytte til. Her skriver han om viktigheten av filosofi for fysikk og om det han ser som en skadelig "anti-filosofisk" holdning hos en del fysikere. https://t.co/WXEpkYZChn
RT @margaretwerth: Physics needs philosophy, by quantum gravity physicist @carlorovelli https://t.co/XHvfAZ6UyI
"mountains of useless" physics PS re equations = language —> The Grammars Of The Universe? https://t.co/f0UicNyUe9 https://t.co/R9yh3dPIlv
Physics needs philosophy, by quantum gravity physicist @carlorovelli https://t.co/XHvfAZ6UyI
a real seeker of truth https://t.co/PqWK84UOAn
RT @JimBaggott: ‘Those who deny the utility of philosophy, are doing philosophy.’ Aristotle, quoted by @carlorovelli in his latest paper on…
‘When we consider ourselves to be “speculating widely”, we are mostly playing out rearrangements of old tunes: true novelty that works is not something we can just find by guesswork.’ @carlorovelli #quote https://t.co/x9zZQ02VD5
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
“Science has repeatedly redefined its own understanding of itself, along with its goals, its methods, and its tools. This flexibility has played a major role in its success.” — Carlo Rovelli, Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics https://t.c
It's amazing how many good physicists just don't get it. Setting it straight.... https://t.co/2dO8l88M7e
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
"Science is not a project with a methodology written in stone, well circumscribed objectives, or a fixed conceptual structure. It is our ever evolving endeavour to better understand the world." https://t.co/AGxdycbCKd
"When Weinberg and Hawking state that philosophy is useless, they're actually stating adherence to a particular philosophy of science. In principle, there’s nothing wrong with that. The problem is it's not a good philosophy of science." https://t.co/AGxdyc
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
an interesting companion to @philipcball's interview with Michela Massimi (@p_realism): Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy needs physics, by @carlorovelli https://t.co/AZSpxfY8F4
"Those who deny the utility of philosophy, are doing philosophy" - Aristotle, by way of Carlo Rovelli https://t.co/TOEqkVA064
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
A lot of good points in "Physics Needs Philosophy; Philosophy Needs Physics" by Carlo Rovelli. So glad I've been checking the History and Philosophy of Physics arXiv! https://t.co/wUSl7fDbrN
A thoughtful piece by @carlorovelli https://t.co/c4Jn6Y6Rbi
This is a great paper on philosophy and physics, although I have one criticism https://t.co/tGzD0Y57Bt
RT @DivulgaMadrid: Science is not a project with a methodology written in stone. It is our ever evolving endeavour to better understand the…
Why SCIENCE needs #philosophy ;) #science #philosophyofscience https://t.co/cE8nZxJflc
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
RT @JimBaggott: ‘Those who deny the utility of philosophy, are doing philosophy.’ Aristotle, quoted by @carlorovelli in his latest paper on…
RT @JimBaggott: ‘Those who deny the utility of philosophy, are doing philosophy.’ Aristotle, quoted by @carlorovelli in his latest paper on…
Science is not a project with a methodology written in stone. It is our ever evolving endeavour to better understand the world. In the course of its development, it has repeatedly violated its own rules and its own stated methodological assumptions. https:
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
RT @JimBaggott: ‘Those who deny the utility of philosophy, are doing philosophy.’ Aristotle, quoted by @carlorovelli in his latest paper on…
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk
good article, well worth a read by any scientist...biology would also benefit from an enhanced dialogue with philosophy as well... https://t.co/yyeMPVqq7I
RT @SydneyPhysics: I read this on the train coming in this morning - worth the time I think. Whether you agree or disagree, I think scienti…
I read this on the train coming in this morning - worth the time I think. Whether you agree or disagree, I think scientists should take time once in a while to muse on underpinnings. Shouldn't be a stretch for a Doctor of Philosophy to mull over some from
RT @JimBaggott: ‘Those who deny the utility of philosophy, are doing philosophy.’ Aristotle, quoted by @carlorovelli in his latest paper on…
RT @philipcball: Why physics needs philosophy - from a leading physicist https://t.co/PBDYk8wptk