↓ Skip to main content

How Stone Tools Shaped Us: Post-Phenomenology and Material Engagement Theory

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy & Technology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
How Stone Tools Shaped Us: Post-Phenomenology and Material Engagement Theory
Published in
Philosophy & Technology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13347-018-0310-x
Authors

Manjari Chakrabarty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 40%
Student > Bachelor 3 30%
Student > Master 3 30%
Researcher 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 3 30%
Psychology 3 30%
Arts and Humanities 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,246,934
of 13,968,403 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy & Technology
#87
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,612
of 274,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy & Technology
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,968,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.