↓ Skip to main content

Biotechnology applied to fish reproduction: tools for conservation

Overview of attention for article published in Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Biotechnology applied to fish reproduction: tools for conservation
Published in
Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10695-018-0506-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diógenes Henrique de Siqueira-Silva, Taiju Saito, Amanda Pereira dos Santos-Silva, Raphael da Silva Costa, Martin Psenicka, George Shigueki Yasui

Abstract

This review discusses the new biotechnological tools that are arising and promising for conservation and enhancement of fish production, mainly regarding the endangered and the most economically important species. Two main techniques, in particular, are available to avoid extinction of endangered fish species and to improve the production of commercial species. Germ cell transplantation technology includes a number of approaches that have been studied, such as the transplantation of embryo-to-embryo blastomere, embryo-to-embryo differentiated PGC, larvae to larvae and embryo differentiated PGC, transplantation of spermatogonia from adult to larvae or between adults, and oogonia transplantation. However, the success of germ cell transplantation relies on the prior sterilization of fish, which can be performed at different stages of fish species development by means of several protocols that have been tested in order to achieve the best approach to produce a sterile fish. Among them, fish hybridization and triploidization, germline gene knockdown, hyperthermia, and chemical treatment deserve attention based on important results achieved thus far. This review currently used technologies and knowledge about surrogate technology and fish sterilization, discussing the stronger and the weaker points of each approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 22%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 32 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 4%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 42 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,604,390
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Fish Physiology and Biochemistry
#414
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,006
of 326,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fish Physiology and Biochemistry
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.