| Title |
Visual illusions in predator–prey interactions: birds find moving patterned prey harder to catch
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-015-0874-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liisa Hämäläinen, Janne Valkonen, Johanna Mappes, Bibiana Rojas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| Japan | 2 | 7% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 56% |
| Scientists | 9 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 56% |
| Psychology | 8 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,228,028
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#456
of 1,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,585
of 279,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.