↓ Skip to main content

Design methods and code structure: a comparative case study

Overview of attention for article published in Software Quality Journal, September 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 144)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

q&a
2 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Design methods and code structure: a comparative case study
Published in
Software Quality Journal, September 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00402267
Authors

S. Kada, D. Woods, R. J. Cole

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Professor 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 60%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2011.
All research outputs
#5,844,465
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Software Quality Journal
#14
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,305
of 20,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Software Quality Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them