↓ Skip to main content

Design methods and code structure: a comparative case study

Overview of attention for article published in Software Quality Journal, September 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

q&a
2 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Design methods and code structure: a comparative case study
Published in
Software Quality Journal, September 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00402267
Authors

S. Kada, D. Woods, R. J. Cole

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 67%
Professor 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 100%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2011.
All research outputs
#1,549,132
of 8,029,393 outputs
Outputs from Software Quality Journal
#2
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,715
of 82,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Software Quality Journal
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,029,393 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them