↓ Skip to main content

Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Current Infectious Disease Reports, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 493)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Pregnancy
Published in
Current Infectious Disease Reports, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11908-015-0462-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. J. Aguin, J. D. Sobel

Abstract

Prevalence studies indicate that Candida species colonize the vagina in at least 20 % of all women, rising to 30 % in pregnancy. Although, some studies concluded that pregnant women were more likely to have symptomatic vaginal infections caused by Candida, yet other studies found a high prevalence of asymptomatic infection only during pregnancy. Most episodes of symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) occur during the second and third trimesters. The increased risk of VVC in pregnancy is likely sustained by pregnancy-related factors, such as immunologic alterations, increased estrogen levels, and increased vaginal glycogen production. Although evidence is incomplete, there is some emerging data which suggests that candidiasis in pregnancy may be associated with increased risk of pregnancy complications, such as premature rupture of membranes, preterm labor, chorioamnionitis, and congenital cutaneous candidiasis. In contrast to nonpregnant women, there are no formal studies, evaluating the use of long-term suppressive maintenance oral azoles in the treatment of recurrent VVC (RVVC) in pregnancy. Most clinicians do not offer suppressive therapy in pregnancy and prefer to treat individual symptomatic episodes only utilizing a topical imidazole vaginally for 7 days to minimize systemic exposure to medications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 214 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 18%
Student > Master 34 16%
Researcher 14 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Other 12 6%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 71 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 7%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 76 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,607,716
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#29
of 493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,345
of 265,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.