@unhealthytruth @elonmusk Lol organic meat is MORE carcinogenic than non organic meat. https://t.co/DRUyHDt7hJ
@ryanjt2718 @robertlufkinmd @DoctorTro Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). https://t.co/CyJJMRAggh
Ayrıca bak: https://t.co/fIeU4nTfRy https://t.co/vGcXuA00cc
@Thermostar45 @MrKatz And before you go saying "grass fed", and "organic" Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). https://t.co/CyJJMRAO5P
"Esto es especialmente relevante en la carne de cordero, donde el consumo de productos orgánicos implica un riesgo cancerígeno hasta 1,5 veces mayor que el consumo de la producida convencionalmente, tanto en adultos como en niños". https://t.co/ucDpI0S8Au
@ascentovalhalla @theproof Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). https://t.co/CyJJMRAO5P
@CascadingKrill @Fastinh @CarnivoreSapien ...Thats exactly why I just said to be careful of continuously using "meat" as a blanket term. And no, even organic red meat is still a carcinogen. https://t.co/vDbCXCeqvi
@BMCRider69 @SBakerMD Quality of meat, doesn't matter, its still technically toxic due to POPs and Neu5gc Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). https://t
@victouflachips1 @vegansince96 Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). https://t.co/CyJJMRAO5P
@Dadesway @yslburner12345 @KenDBerryMD Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). https://t.co/CyJJMRAO5P
@McAW3SOM3 @vegansince96 @bulkbiker @AlpacaAurelius Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). https://t.co/CyJJMRAO5P
RT @ChristofferHN: @AlejandroTN7 @NutritionMadeS3 This RCT suggest no difference in markers b/w grass-fed and grain-fed meat & dairy. https…
@AlejandroTN7 @NutritionMadeS3 This RCT suggest no difference in markers b/w grass-fed and grain-fed meat & dairy. https://t.co/mh4s5QEKGt While this study suggest same level of carcinogenic POPs b/w conventional and organic meat (raised on a blended
@mkolken Perhaps less judgy, but no less carcinogenic. Bon appétit. https://t.co/F3qfxiuQkh
@Mark13_24 @SBakerMD Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). https://t.co/CyJJMRAO5P
@ScottMcAlba @SBakerMD Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). https://t.co/CyJJMRAO5P
@renzothealgieri @SBakerMD Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). https://t.co/CyJJMRAO5P
Unfortunately, environmental toxins are everywhere. There are still benefits to eating organic / grassfed over conventional. Better nutrition. Less chemicals. Better for the animals and the planet.
@SBakerMD It is a favorite pass time to enjoy a nice steak, but times changes https://t.co/6TvMMZemFW
@DrRichHuntsman Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). https://t.co/CyJJMRAO5P
@AsarCadyn @SBakerMD And before you go saying it should grass fed and organic. Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). https://t.co/CyJJMRAO5P
@Rekt_Futures @Johnmcinnesliv1 @SBakerMD Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). https://t.co/CyJJMRRR7P
@CryptoDreamsNow @DrAseemMalhotra @SBakerMD @GBNEWS Regardless of the quality of meat, you can't avoid the problems that come with cooking flesh at high temperatures, and most importantly the major problem that come with consuming Neu5gc https://t.co/CyJJM
@levelsio @chrswde How do you know that something is really organic? https://t.co/yM7zVIpiLl or https://t.co/d3ZWKvgkJQ
RT @EkolojiE: Organik et tüketimi, kalıcı organik kirleticilerin alımıyla ilişkili kanserojen potansiyeli azaltmaz. https://t.co/fIeU4nTfRy…
Organik et tüketimi, kalıcı organik kirleticilerin alımıyla ilişkili kanserojen potansiyeli azaltmaz. https://t.co/fIeU4nTfRy https://t.co/C8tGeNbNIK
@RubenMurciaPrie https://t.co/whKw3jq6tU Es más, ni el consumo de carne ecológica es seguro. Y no soy vegano ni lo pretendo, pero intento ser realista
"Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs)" https://t.co/LgYBgjvPtx
@VaryIngweion @Oscar_Teix @LostTransposon @ancelkeyslegacy No existe carne buena: https://t.co/iLEfZN4ny0
@farmingGeorge @NFUtweets Please show peer-reviewed studies not industry-funded (& with sufficient duration/participants)! A2 = nice marketing ploy! https://t.co/LJkSEtQ0JC but hasn't even worked well: https://t.co/NS5rZhGNbc Some organic meat worse t
@AviBittMD @NutritionMadeS3 This: relevant enough? "The consumption of organically produced meat does not diminish this carcinogenic risk [from Persistant Organic Pollutants], but on the contrary, it seems to be even higher, especially that associated with
@Idodo_Yes_I_Do תודה איש באינטרנט. יש לא מעט הפניות למחקרים בקישור הקודם. אם יש לך מחקרים שמראים שבשר אורגני הוא דווקא לא קרסינוגני מוזמן לחלוק. (למרות שיש עוד המון סיבות למה בשר זה לא בריא) https://t.co/ImEi3mWRzH
@RabbieGuevara @partysausageuk @Larkkir @Stare_at_Air @JoannaBlythman @GeorgeMonbiot @SusFoodTrust @Riverford @Bovidiva re: cancer-causing chemicals in "organic" meat, 2017 report: "consumption of organically produced meat does not diminish this carcinogen
@FrancePeril @LCP @BGriveaux Visiblement non. Concernant le bio, la consommation de viande issue de l'agriculture biologique non seulement ne semble pas diminuer le risque de cancer, mais on a parfois constaté qu'il était encore plus élevée. https://t.co/0
@TimLewis33 @DNSWilson @rob_omgwtf @FructoseNo @pownutrition @BelindaFettke @drjoesDIYhealth @KenDBerryMD @SBakerMD @LouiseStephen9 @WeDietitians @GeorgiaEdeMD @MarikaSboros @bigfatsurprise "The consumption of organically produced meat does not diminish th
@spsingh1 @SBakerMD @tednaiman @TuitNutrition @KetoCarnivore "But you have to eat organic grass fed beef!" uuhhh NO. https://t.co/yjyXyKNZRO
@ShalinJShahMD @IanCramer if there is a difference I suspect it won't be fundamental. you still have heme iron, animal protein (leading to IGF-1), etc. I guess we'll see when more research comes out. organic-fed doesnt seem to help https://t.co/NJxszeRLzC
@curtparks1 @bpnutrition Grass fed/finished or grain doesn't make a difference. Either way POPs and other toxins are a problem. https://t.co/q0SLFWCgG7
@EAllen0417 @bpnutrition "Strikingly, the consumption of organically produced meat does not diminish this carcinogenic risk, but on the contrary, it seems to be even higher, especially that associated with lamb consumption." https://t.co/q0SLFWCgG7 https:
Persistent Organic Pollutants: "Strikingly, the consumption of organically produced meat does not diminish this carcinogenic risk, but on the contrary, it seems to be even higher, especially that associated with lamb consumption." https://t.co/q0SLFWCgG7
Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent… https://t.co/W0crBuU1rA
@Food_Transition pr info, le pouvoir cancérigène de viande bio n'a rien à envier à celui de viande conventionnelle... http://t.co/zPrRDpdtmW
...la belle affaire : la viande bio contient autant de substances cancérigènes que viande non bio ! http://t.co/zPrRDpdtmW
Organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants http://t.co/H0k6eyGdp2
Organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants http://t.co/H0k6eyGdp2
New study finds consumption of organically produced meat appears to raise carcinogenic risk. http://t.co/vcmhVjcCQc
New study finds consumption of organically produced meat appears to raise carcinogenic risk. http://t.co/vcmhVjcCQc
Sin diferencias en contaminantes carcinogénicos entre la carne ecológica-orgánica y la carne convencional http://t.co/kYXGPYLq3J
Consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent… http://t.co/Ev30U7pleE
Sin diferencias en contaminantes carcinogénicos entre la carne ecológica-orgánica y la carne convencional http://t.co/kYXGPYLq3J
Sin diferencias en contaminantes carcinogénicos entre la carne ecológica-orgánica y la carne convencional http://t.co/kYXGPYLq3J
Sin diferencias en contaminantes carcinogénicos entre la carne ecológica-orgánica y la carne convencional http://t.co/kYXGPYLq3J
Sin diferencias en contaminantes carcinogénicos entre la carne ecológica-orgánica y la carne convencional http://t.co/kYXGPYLq3J