↓ Skip to main content

Progress testing: critical analysis and suggested practices

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Health Sciences Education, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Progress testing: critical analysis and suggested practices
Published in
Advances in Health Sciences Education, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10459-015-9587-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Albanese, Susan M. Case

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 22 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 51%
Social Sciences 9 18%
Unspecified 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 6 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2016.
All research outputs
#1,673,833
of 7,313,486 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#140
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,757
of 201,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,313,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.