↓ Skip to main content

Effect of bisphosphonates treatment on cytokine imbalance between TH17 and Treg in osteoporosis

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammopharmacology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Effect of bisphosphonates treatment on cytokine imbalance between TH17 and Treg in osteoporosis
Published in
Inflammopharmacology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10787-015-0233-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roba M. Talaat, Asmaa Sidek, Ahmed Mosalem, Ahmed Kholief

Abstract

Imbalance of T-helper-cell (TH) subsets (TH1/TH2/TH17) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) is suggested to contribute to the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Broken TH17/Treg balance has been reported contributing to several inflammatory diseases. Although bisphosphonates are well-recognized inhibitors of osteoclastic activity, there is no serious examination of their effect on T cell subset (TH1/TH2/TH17/Treg) balances. Patients were categorized into 20 osteopenic and 20 osteoporotic patients treated with bisphosphonates for 1 year. We studied plasma levels of interleukins 4 (IL-4), IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, IL-23, and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and their interrelations and correlation with osteoporosis treatment were evaluated. Treated osteoporotic patients have a significant reduction of plasma IL-6 (p < 0.05), IL-17 (p < 0.05), IL-23 (p < 0.05), and IFN-γ (p < 0.05), a significant increase in IL-4 (p < 0.05), IL-10 (p < 0.05), and TGF-β (p < 0.001), and comparable IL-12 levels as compared to controls. In conclusion, the significant reduction of Th17 cell cytokine cascade (IL-6, IL-17, and IL-23) and elevation of Treg cytokine cascade (IL-10 and TGF-β) might be considered as a very important observation about the effect of bisphosphonates on TH17/Treg imbalance in osteoporosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Other 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2015.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Inflammopharmacology
#406
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,070
of 266,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammopharmacology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.