| Title |
The mechanisms of action of vaccines containing aluminum adjuvants: an in vitro vs in vivo paradigm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40064-015-0972-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tirth Raj Ghimire |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 22% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 220 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Researcher | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 48 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 45 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 22 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,951,244
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#95
of 1,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,210
of 262,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#3
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.