Does Giving Parents Their Choice of Interventions for Child Behavior Problems Improve Child Outcomes?
Prevention Science, January 2018
Abigail H. Gewirtz, Susanne S. Lee, Gerald J. August, Yaliu He
Empowering consumers to be active decision-makers in their own care is a core tenet of personalized, or precision medicine. Nonetheless, there is a dearth of research on intervention preferences in families seeking interventions for a child with behavior problems. Specifically, the evidence is inconclusive as to whether providing parents with choice of intervention improves child/youth outcomes (i.e., reduces externalizing problems). In this study, 129 families presenting to community mental health clinics for child conduct problems were enrolled in a doubly randomized preference study and initially randomized to choice or no-choice conditions. Families assigned to the choice condition were offered their choice of intervention from among three different formats of the Parent Management Training-Oregon Model/PMTO (group, individual clinic, home based) and services-as-usual (child-focused therapy). Those assigned to the no-choice condition were again randomized, to one of the four intervention conditions. Intent-to-treat analyses revealed partial support for the effect of parental choice on child intervention outcomes. Assignment to the choice condition predicted teacher-reported improved child hyperactivity/inattention outcomes at 6 months post-treatment completion. No main effect of choice on parent reported child outcomes was found. Moderation analyses indicated that among parents who selected PMTO, teacher report of hyperactivity/inattention was significantly improved compared with parents selecting SAU, and compared with those assigned to PMTO within the no-choice condition. Contrary to hypotheses, teacher report of hyperactivity/inattention was also significantly improved for families assigned to SAU within the no-choice condition, indicating that within the no-choice condition, SAU outperformed the parenting interventions. Implications for prevention research are discussed.
|Members of the public||2||100%|
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||4||25%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||19%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||6%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||13%|
|Arts and Humanities||1||6%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||6%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||6%|