@FrederikSchenk Didn't see it in those pages. In section 1.2 it's implied to contrast with what we know with confidence about climate. Outside the book she tried to define types of uncertainty. https://t.co/YAzQ49ABY4 https://t.co/bp9BnkjqRS [https://t.c
@TaroIstok @DaveWRose @Cypress_NL @Veritatem2021 @TheSebConrad @GeraldKutney @MyMuskokaLife @25_cycle @Icecinder @Devonian1342 @AristotleMrs @just_us6973 @akaelwopo1 @bobathon @buchart What are your scientific credentials? Should everyone ignore everything
@ProfGrantPetty @crentsch @popesclimate You're not reading hard enough. I have 2000 blog posts at Climate Etc., most of which provide this kind of evidence. Not talking about fundamental observational evidence, but rather climate models and how the eviden
@dana1981 Alleged statement #3: "IPCC is alarmist". The apparent 'source of this statement is my (invited) published paper Reasoning about Climate Uncertainty. Deal link, but here it is. The paper obviously did not say this. https://t.co/DTWGdsREec
@OCoonassa @ahollander314 @PrisonPlanet https://t.co/Uz483dveP1 https://t.co/oscaEewfP5 https://t.co/ckAD4pDrPn https://t.co/P6k1fRAzrX https://t.co/lsyYjEderD Let me know when you're done. There's 800 more.
@elmorsa La incertidumbre climática muchas veces no se toma en cuenta a la hora de intentar explicar el "cambio" climático, dado que los propios modelos usados, por ejemplo, el IPCC, son errados, por la propia naturaleza https://t.co/Z7PvLRSdh1
@Wiglet1981 Some insights in my article https://t.co/xlR3viGMKV
@BoswachterRob Over de quote in de afbeelding: Judith Curry heeft 1 peer reviewed publicatie, btw: https://t.co/mHPfarYNaH Dit (2011) : https://t.co/KwTaizbcUa CO2 komt er niet in voor. CTRL+F 'co' levert 1 hit op: 'cookiepolicy'.
RT @ThomasBeyer: @dan613 @GagneRenaud @stephenfgordon The trajectory of temp increase is uncertain. @ipcc has frequently been wrong about t…
@dan613 @GagneRenaud @stephenfgordon The trajectory of temp increase is uncertain. @ipcc has frequently been wrong about their excessive projections. Here is one of many peer-reviewed articles, for example by @curryja https://t.co/iCAudCNYxE
@AppleheadEmma Heartland or no, he is a renowned MIT scientist and talks sense. Did you get this one? https://t.co/qwYG0XRMSp
@c4palicot @SkyPhilippe @PaulMaxit @M_Orphelin @Contrepoints @Causeur @Le_Figaro Quant à votre amie Judith Curry à part despamphlets à charge, rien de concret ni de bien scientifique et surtout: #NotPeerReviewed à part un texte qui n'invalide rien, mais ju
@wlbeeton @ChippyOldGit @past_is_future @Balinteractive @Mathius38 @madcanadian2017 @SarahEMyhre @Woods8Craig @CliffMass @tan123 "100% of peer reviewed science concludes so from the overwhelming evidence." 🤦♂️ https://t.co/dmyTOCIwYE https://t.co/le0WGN
Here's one. https://t.co/KOkf7C1QJ4 https://t.co/dForjrp45U
IPCC and treatment of uncertainties | Climate Etc @curryja http://t.co/S4koKBfM0g referrencing @SpringerGeo http://t.co/yUsKtRIoOP