Bayesian accounts of covert selective attention: A tutorial review

@JessicaHullman 🤔

@JeffRouder Later work tried to debunk the idea of attentional resources because it wasn’t well operationalised. Personally I think many attentional phenomena are better seen as by products of Bayesian inference. See review here https://t.co/CfIolY7kID

@nikaadamian Here’s my review on this https://t.co/CfIolY7kID

@waterlego It’s definitely not one thing. My view is that a lot of what is considered attentional is in fact inferential... https://t.co/CfIolY7kID

@danwilliamsphil I think I did here https://t.co/FC5KjZw4Ir and https://t.co/CfIolYoVAb but it wasn’t the central argument

also see my in depth primer... "Bayesian accounts of covert selective attention: A tutorial review" https://t.co/yapAgHkPwX

RT @inferencelab: Bayesian accounts of covert selective attention: A tutorial review. https://t.co/qHW8tEyxOA

Bayesian accounts of covert selective attention: A tutorial review. https://t.co/qHW8tEyxOA

@BR_Innes many cued localisation experiments have been done, this might be what you are after? See Fig 2 in my review http://t.co/qHW8tEyxOA