Title |
Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Clinical and Economic Evidence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-011-1721-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Raj Padwal, Scott Klarenbach, Natasha Wiebe, Maureen Hazel, Daniel Birch, Shahzeer Karmali, Arya M. Sharma, Braden Manns, Marcello Tonelli |
Abstract |
Use of bariatric surgery for severe obesity has increased dramatically. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 2% |
France | 3 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 251 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 40 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 13% |
Researcher | 31 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 7% |
Other | 64 | 24% |
Unknown | 52 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 109 | 41% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
Psychology | 10 | 4% |
Other | 28 | 11% |
Unknown | 71 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2014.
All research outputs
#1,913,035
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,488
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,252
of 112,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.