↓ Skip to main content

Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, December 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, December 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf01320097
Authors

Frank N. Dempster

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 81 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Master 15 18%
Researcher 15 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 33%
Social Sciences 15 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Computer Science 8 9%
Linguistics 3 4%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 7 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2011.
All research outputs
#6,922,035
of 11,189,191 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#247
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,856
of 93,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,189,191 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.