↓ Skip to main content

Microfracture combined with osteochondral paste implantation was more effective than microfracture alone for full-thickness cartilage repair

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Microfracture combined with osteochondral paste implantation was more effective than microfracture alone for full-thickness cartilage repair
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00167-012-2031-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linzi Xing, Yiqiu Jiang, Jianchao Gui, Yiming Lu, Feng Gao, Yang Xu, Yan Xu

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the microfracture combined with osteochondral paste implantation could promote the quality of the regenerated tissue in the knee joints of rabbits.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Unspecified 3 9%
Engineering 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,634,383
of 12,215,443 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#927
of 1,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,496
of 219,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#23
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,215,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.