@juliafstrand I think this paper about McGurk stimuli has test-retest in it. https://t.co/AuEeSxBUpA
@c_boeykens @pieter_moors Reminded of this one on the McGurk effect (that I know better) https://t.co/8Mo0aRCdKa
@IrisVanRooij Real but also... https://t.co/mQpTVGEcyW
@JhendersonIMB @bradpwyble @IrisVanRooij @TimoRoettger I don’t understand the sudden excitement/shock. Given that we know this since at least 2015: https://t.co/K9WmKHC78x
@aina_puce https://t.co/kiGGGJKyGD the ref I had in mind. I misremembered that some McGurk stim had near ceiling effects across participants. Not true
@andrea_e_martin @neuroconscience @aina_puce 12 different McGurk stim; n=165 subj; fusion range: 17-58%; big intersubj var: bimodal distribution. https://t.co/kiGGGJKyGD
Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type http://t.co/JmaCXO21Dw
Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type http://t.co/JmaCXO21Dw
Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type http://t.co/JmaCXO21Dw
Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type http://t.co/JmaCXO21Dw
Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type http://t.co/JmaCXO21Dw
Inter-subject and inter-stimuli variability in the McGurk effect. @AV_SP http://t.co/yOgCfmsYbe
Inter-subject and inter-stimuli variability in the McGurk effect. @AV_SP http://t.co/yOgCfmsYbe