↓ Skip to main content

A posteriori error analysis of stabilised FEM for degenerate convex minimisation problems under weak regularity assumptions

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
A posteriori error analysis of stabilised FEM for degenerate convex minimisation problems under weak regularity assumptions
Published in
Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2213-7467-1-5
Authors

Wolfgang Boiger, Carsten Carstensen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2018.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences
#23
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,094
of 323,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.