↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered dental esthetics in cases with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered dental esthetics in cases with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/2196-1042-14-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Rosa, Alessia Olimpo, Rosamaria Fastuca, Alberto Caprioglio

Abstract

The smile perception of patients is not strictly related to standardized protocols and technical implications which certainly affect clinicians' decisions. The absence of maxillary lateral incisors could affect smile esthetics either with treatment or not. The aim of the present study was to investigate if different perceptions on altered smiles due to missing maxillary lateral incisors, with or without treatment, exist among different groups of people (laypersons, adult orthodontic patients, general dentists, and orthodontists).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 18 15%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 34 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 63%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 35 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2014.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#220
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,933
of 219,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.