↓ Skip to main content

Learning From Noisy Examples

Overview of attention for article published in Machine Learning, April 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Learning From Noisy Examples
Published in
Machine Learning, April 1988
DOI 10.1023/a:1022873112823
Authors

Dana Angluin, Philip Laird

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 155 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 30%
Student > Master 28 16%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 83 49%
Engineering 14 8%
Mathematics 11 6%
Physics and Astronomy 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 36 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2015.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Machine Learning
#896
of 1,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,943
of 12,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machine Learning
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,225 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.