↓ Skip to main content

Haemophilus influenzae and the lung (Haemophilus and the lung)

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
Title
Haemophilus influenzae and the lung (Haemophilus and the lung)
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/2001-1326-1-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul King

Abstract

Haemophilus influenzae is present as a commensal organism in the nasopharynx of most healthy adults from where it can spread to cause both systemic and respiratory tract infection. This bacterium is divided into typeable forms (such as type b) or nontypeable forms based on the presence or absence of a tough polysaccharide capsule. Respiratory disease is predominantly caused by the nontypeable forms (NTHi). Haemophilus influenzae has evolved a number of strategies to evade the host defense including the ability to invade into local tissue. Pathogenic properties of this bacterium as well as defects in host defense may result in the spread of this bacterium from the upper airway to the bronchi of the lung. This can result in airway inflammation and colonization particularly in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Treatment of respiratory tract infection with Haemophilus influenzae is often only partially successful with ongoing infection and inflammation. Improvement in patient outcome will be dependent on a better understanding of the pathogenesis and host immune response to this bacterium.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 312 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 79 25%
Student > Master 45 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 14%
Researcher 20 6%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 72 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 31 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Other 32 10%
Unknown 86 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,929,769
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#268
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,341
of 181,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them