| Title |
Sleeping on a problem: the impact of sleep disturbance on intensive care patients - a clinical review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-015-0043-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lori J Delaney, Frank Van Haren, Violeta Lopez |
| Abstract |
Sleep disturbance is commonly encountered amongst intensive care patients and has significant psychophysiological effects, which protract recovery and increases mortality. Bio-physiological monitoring of intensive care patients reveal alterations in sleep architecture, with reduced sleep quality and continuity. The etiological causes of sleep disturbance are considered to be multifactorial, although environmental stressors namely, noise, light and clinical care interactions have been frequently cited in both subjective and objective studies. As a result, interventions are targeted towards modifiable factors to ameliorate their impact. This paper reviews normal sleep physiology and the impact that sleep disturbance has on patient psychophysiological recovery, and the contribution that the clinical environment has on intensive care patients' sleep. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 33% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 247 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 21% |
| Unknown | 70 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 24% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 80 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#481,050
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#42
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,548
of 272,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them