| Title |
The European technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools under the water framework directive
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Sciences Europe, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12302-015-0039-4 |
| Authors |
Ann-Sofie Wernersson, Mario Carere, Chiara Maggi, Petr Tusil, Premysl Soldan, Alice James, Wilfried Sanchez, Valeria Dulio, Katja Broeg, Georg Reifferscheid, Sebastian Buchinger, Hannie Maas, Esther Van Der Grinten, Simon O’Toole, Antonella Ausili, Loredana Manfra, Laura Marziali, Stefano Polesello, Ines Lacchetti, Laura Mancini, Karl Lilja, Maria Linderoth, Tove Lundeberg, Bengt Fjällborg, Tobias Porsbring, DG Joakim Larsson, Johan Bengtsson-Palme, Lars Förlin, Cornelia Kienle, Petra Kunz, Etienne Vermeirssen, Inge Werner, Craig D Robinson, Brett Lyons, Ioanna Katsiadaki, Caroline Whalley, Klaas den Haan, Marlies Messiaen, Helen Clayton, Teresa Lettieri, Raquel Negrão Carvalho, Bernd Manfred Gawlik, Henner Hollert, Carolina Di Paolo, Werner Brack, Ulrike Kammann, Robert Kase |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Cambodia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 273 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 103 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 18% |
| Engineering | 15 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 75 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#908,251
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#58
of 625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,191
of 278,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them