↓ Skip to main content

Arthroscopic pubic symphysis debridement and adductor enthesis repair in athletes with athletic pubalgia: technical note and video illustration

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Arthroscopic pubic symphysis debridement and adductor enthesis repair in athletes with athletic pubalgia: technical note and video illustration
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00402-014-2065-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sascha Hopp, Masjudin Tumin, Peter Wilhelm, Tim Pohlemann, Jens Kelm

Abstract

We elaborately describe our novel arthroscopic technique of the symphysis pubis in athletes with osteitis pubis and concomitant adductor enthesopathy who fail to conservative treatment modalities. The symphysis pubis is debrided arthroscopically and the degenerated origin of adductor tendon (enthesis) is excised and reattached. With our surgical procedure the stability of the symphysis pubis is successfully preserved and the adductor longus enthesopathy simultaneously addressed in the same setting.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Unspecified 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Unspecified 3 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2015.
All research outputs
#10,833,139
of 12,219,921 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery
#508
of 550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,357
of 223,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,219,921 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 550 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.