Title |
Individual and Organizational Antecedents of Misconduct in Organizations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, May 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10551-008-9772-6 |
Authors |
Nicole Andreoli, Joel Lefkowitz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 216 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 25% |
Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
Other | 49 | 22% |
Unknown | 28 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 100 | 45% |
Psychology | 34 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 23 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 5% |
Engineering | 5 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 7% |
Unknown | 31 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,834,120
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#620
of 2,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,748
of 79,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.