↓ Skip to main content

A timeline for the introduction of synthetic dyestuffs in Japan during the late Edo and Meiji periods

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
A timeline for the introduction of synthetic dyestuffs in Japan during the late Edo and Meiji periods
Published in
Heritage Science, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40494-018-0187-0
Authors

Anna Cesaratto, Yan-Bing Luo, Henry D. Smith, Marco Leona

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 11 25%
Chemistry 9 20%
Materials Science 4 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,118,497
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#184
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,226
of 329,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.