↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guideline for CKD 2013

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Nephrology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guideline for CKD 2013
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Nephrology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10157-014-0949-2
Pubmed ID

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 22%
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 37%
Unspecified 9 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 3 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2015.
All research outputs
#9,768,472
of 12,224,035 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Nephrology
#205
of 382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,553
of 223,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Nephrology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,224,035 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 382 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.