@beausievers @tsonj if what you're after is a strong defense of the distinction between psychology and neuroscience, fodor is a classic source (https://t.co/HCn7wAmJqB). but perhaps it sounds like you want something more specific
RT @IrisVanRooij: It all started with this tweet and the one it quotes btw: https://t.co/OK3grsu1ly
It all started with this tweet and the one it quotes btw: https://t.co/OK3grsu1ly
RT @chazfirestone: No! Of the many reasons to doubt this, two of my favorites are https://t.co/JaEhJb1xnX and https://t.co/Npen0eGTZu; very…
RT @chazfirestone: No! Of the many reasons to doubt this, two of my favorites are https://t.co/JaEhJb1xnX and https://t.co/Npen0eGTZu; very…
RT @chazfirestone: No! Of the many reasons to doubt this, two of my favorites are https://t.co/JaEhJb1xnX and https://t.co/Npen0eGTZu; very…
RT @chazfirestone: No! Of the many reasons to doubt this, two of my favorites are https://t.co/JaEhJb1xnX and https://t.co/Npen0eGTZu; very…
No! Of the many reasons to doubt this, two of my favorites are https://t.co/JaEhJb1xnX and https://t.co/Npen0eGTZu; very different ideas in many ways, by very different thinkers (@danieldennett and Jerry Fodor!), but both opposed to this kind of thinking
@MichaelPayton67 is this the money discussion you mean? https://t.co/3pHC8iSR56 if so, very different than fodor's! https://t.co/dBfKoIaX9V
@wpmcn It's from "The disunity of science as a working hypothesis" http://t.co/AwX8PywO