@mikejohansenmd @S_brimble @reverendofdoubt @bnallamo @mikejohansenmd , with respect of this issue, I recommend you this editorial’serie published in Intensive Care Medicine journal: (i) https://t.co/IrZpi4w6jf ; (ii) https://t.co/G6YpoT72tY ; and (iii) ht
The evidence "hierarchy" isn't the solution to evidence-based practice imo. Appraisal skills, critical thinking, and asking the right questions are key for EBP. https://t.co/H7kBj4HsBS https://t.co/ClHB4jrkKg https://t.co/l50LCPEbl9
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @jtoanle: 1/3: "Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No" I really can't tell if this is satire or not... A…
RT @pfanderson: Intensive Care Medicine April 2018, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 515–517 Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful re…
Intensive Care Medicine April 2018, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 515–517 Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No Sylvie Chevret; Niall D. Ferguson; Rinaldo Bellomo <https://t.co/0lUbfbrtl3> #sysrev
Sind systematische Reviews und Metaanalysen sinnvoll? Hier eine Pro/Con Diskussion Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/pEVH4QbX6w https://t.co/qLKF9bGehX... https://t.co/3rnZCd5Qnh
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
El meta-análisis es la forma más alta de evidencia? https://t.co/KIDb12crGg
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
Could not agree more. Garbage in, garbage out. https://t.co/FbahLPuMMI
RT @PendlKM: Does anyone else feel as if this meta-analysis has left the water just as muddy as before it was written? https://t.co/6ljTY9Y…
Does anyone else feel as if this meta-analysis has left the water just as muddy as before it was written? https://t.co/6ljTY9YSLy
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
Sometimes... https://t.co/9ivf11CwbB
RT @ATSCritCare: A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as th…
A new meta-analysis of steroids in septic shock (https://t.co/5lP9AOWuMg). Meta-analysis has historically been seen as the "highest" form of evidence...but should it be? (https://t.co/wQ1AQSReMs, https://t.co/ym17K1DWNm)
手段と目的と Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No | SpringerLink: https://t.co/JHzxz5moql
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @DrTraceyK: Systematic Review: are you a lover or a hater? Thanks @HilThom123 for sharing. Rigorous methods will always be necessary! ht…
Systematic Review: are you a lover or a hater? Thanks @HilThom123 for sharing. Rigorous methods will always be necessary! https://t.co/ML4AIf21D0
Are systematic reviews still useful?Yes? No? Not sure? Get summary of differing views here. https://t.co/gcTuYfhpDu; https://t.co/jpDu2C3NT5; https://t.co/0q4EvT2ie7
RT @pash22: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No https://t.co/a4sqE1PDAt
RT @DrIanKellar: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No | SpringerLink https://t.co/9l9dSvXeVl via https://t.co…
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @pash22: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No https://t.co/a4sqE1PDAt
RT @pash22: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No https://t.co/a4sqE1PDAt
RT @pash22: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No https://t.co/a4sqE1PDAt
RT @pash22: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No https://t.co/a4sqE1PDAt
RT @pash22: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No https://t.co/a4sqE1PDAt
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No https://t.co/a4sqE1PDAt
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @DrIanKellar: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No | SpringerLink https://t.co/9l9dSvXeVl via https://t.co…
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No | SpringerLink https://t.co/9l9dSvXeVl via https://t.co/xhnvKuuwgC
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @Ruth_Garside: A challenge to #cee2018 - are systematic reviews really just useless attempts to “make gold out of clods of earth”? http…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @jtoanle: 1/3: "Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No" I really can't tell if this is satire or not... A…
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No @ESiCM #PedsICU https://t.co/IoICAbgA5q
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @Ruth_Garside: A challenge to #cee2018 - are systematic reviews really just useless attempts to “make gold out of clods of earth”? http…
RT @Ruth_Garside: A challenge to #cee2018 - are systematic reviews really just useless attempts to “make gold out of clods of earth”? http…
RT @Ruth_Garside: A challenge to #cee2018 - are systematic reviews really just useless attempts to “make gold out of clods of earth”? http…
Seems to be a lot that is factually wrong in this paper & 'not proper research' argument is tired. But also some thought provoking points. https://t.co/SARxN9E3Qo
A challenge to #cee2018 - are systematic reviews really just useless attempts to “make gold out of clods of earth”? https://t.co/tnRGU3shYX
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
I think @AlhazzaniW is going to have something to say about this before long, eh? https://t.co/GgQBJ6BsDx
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? An interesting debate starring Guyatt 👉🏼 https://t.co/IrZpi4w6jf , Bellomo 👉🏼 https://t.co/Fttkm2ognO and Ioannidis 👉🏼 https://t.co/G6YpoT72tY CC @VinayPrasadMD @trishgreenhalgh @adamcifu @gio
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
Yes, this picture is the twitter version of repeating what someone said in a stupid voice. Is this already a thing? https://t.co/623lkTVcqm
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
Two pages of dense black humour here: https://t.co/wOUfcUl9jN I have honoured their table with the typography it deserves in this picture ht @jack_bowdenjack https://t.co/FJHRUrXafj
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @DrArsenioPaez: These 10 points are utter tosh, if you ask me/rubbish. Well conducted systematic reviews/Meta analyses do find “somethin…
RT @Geointheworld: An example of how two decades of empirical and theoretical research showing the merits of meta-analysis can be dismissed…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…