↓ Skip to main content

Adventitious shoot regeneration and in vitro biosynthesis of steroidal lactones in Withania coagulans (Stocks) Dunal

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell, Tissue & Organ Culture, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Adventitious shoot regeneration and in vitro biosynthesis of steroidal lactones in Withania coagulans (Stocks) Dunal
Published in
Plant Cell, Tissue & Organ Culture, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11240-010-9840-3
Authors

Rohit Jain, Arunima Sinha, Devendra Jain, Sumita Kachhwaha, S. L. Kothari

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 31%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Unspecified 2 8%
Other 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 77%
Unspecified 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Social Sciences 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,710,586
of 12,334,049 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell, Tissue & Organ Culture
#394
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,677
of 225,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell, Tissue & Organ Culture
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,334,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.