↓ Skip to main content

Do children without a known bleeding tendency undergoing PICC placement require coagulation laboratory testing?

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Do children without a known bleeding tendency undergoing PICC placement require coagulation laboratory testing?
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00247-014-3207-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joel Woodley-Cook, Joao Amaral, Bairbre Connolly, Leonardo R. Brandão

Abstract

Obtaining basic hemostatic laboratory investigations prior to peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion remains controversial, even if the procedure is converted to a tunneled central venous line (CVL) placement.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 40%
Student > Master 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 40%
Unspecified 1 20%
Arts and Humanities 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#9,769,677
of 12,226,394 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#773
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,791
of 221,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#22
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,226,394 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.