↓ Skip to main content

Diabetes risk and amino acid profiles: cross-sectional and prospective analyses of ethnicity, amino acids and diabetes in a South Asian and European cohort from the SABRE (Southall And Brent REvisited…

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Diabetes risk and amino acid profiles: cross-sectional and prospective analyses of ethnicity, amino acids and diabetes in a South Asian and European cohort from the SABRE (Southall And Brent REvisited) Study
Published in
Diabetologia, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00125-015-3517-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Therese Tillin, Alun D. Hughes, Qin Wang, Peter Würtz, Mika Ala-Korpela, Naveed Sattar, Nita G. Forouhi, Ian F. Godsland, Sophie V. Eastwood, Paul M. McKeigue, Nish Chaturvedi

Abstract

South Asian individuals have an increased risk of diabetes compared with Europeans that is unexplained by obesity and traditional or established metabolic measures. Circulating amino acids (AAs) may provide additional explanatory insights. In a unique cohort of European and South Asian men, we compared cross-sectional associations between AAs, metabolic and obesity traits, and longitudinal associations with incident diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 22%
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Chemistry 8 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 45 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,200,451
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,159
of 5,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,607
of 272,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#16
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.