Why Philosophers should do Semantics (and a bit of syntax too): a Reply to Cappelen

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology, April 2018

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 7 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 6 X posts from 6 X users, with an upper bound of 18,932 followers.

RT @ArchePhilosophy: Ryan Nefdt responds to Herman Cappelen--'Why Philosophers should do Semantics (and a bit of syntax too): a Reply to C…

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @ArchePhilosophy: Ryan Nefdt responds to Herman Cappelen--'Why Philosophers should do Semantics (and a bit of syntax too): a Reply to C…

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @ArchePhilosophy: Ryan Nefdt responds to Herman Cappelen--'Why Philosophers should do Semantics (and a bit of syntax too): a Reply to C…

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @ArchePhilosophy: Ryan Nefdt responds to Herman Cappelen--'Why Philosophers should do Semantics (and a bit of syntax too): a Reply to C…

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @ArchePhilosophy: Ryan Nefdt responds to Herman Cappelen--'Why Philosophers should do Semantics (and a bit of syntax too): a Reply to C…

Reply Repost Favourite

Ryan Nefdt responds to Herman Cappelen--'Why Philosophers should do Semantics (and a bit of syntax too): a Reply to Cappelen'--now published in the Review of Philosophy and Psychology https://t.co/QyJgNK3Cc4

Reply Repost Favourite