↓ Skip to main content

Acoustic structure of songs in island populations of the Japanese bush warbler, Cettia diphone, in relation to sexual selection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Acoustic structure of songs in island populations of the Japanese bush warbler, Cettia diphone, in relation to sexual selection
Published in
Journal of Ethology, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10164-012-0341-1
Authors

Shoji Hamao

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
France 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Unknown 32 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 23%
Student > Master 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Unspecified 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 74%
Unspecified 7 20%
Computer Science 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2015.
All research outputs
#3,647,487
of 12,546,831 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethology
#79
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,401
of 219,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,546,831 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.