↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition of Growth and Methane Consumption in Methylocapsa acidiphila by Mineral Salts

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiology, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Inhibition of Growth and Methane Consumption in Methylocapsa acidiphila by Mineral Salts
Published in
Microbiology, July 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:mici.0000036997.13271.f9
Authors

O. M. Kolesnikov, S. N. Dedysh, N. S. Panikov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 50%
Researcher 3 30%
Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 60%
Environmental Science 3 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#8,784,015
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Microbiology
#2,051
of 5,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,286
of 59,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiology
#22
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.