↓ Skip to main content

The role of pedagogical tools in active learning: a case for sense-making

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of STEM Education, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
The role of pedagogical tools in active learning: a case for sense-making
Published in
International Journal of STEM Education, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40594-018-0116-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milo Koretsky, Jessie Keeler, John Ivanovitch, Ying Cao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Lecturer 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 44 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 29 22%
Arts and Humanities 10 7%
Engineering 9 7%
Physics and Astronomy 6 4%
Mathematics 6 4%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 45 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,462,180
of 23,852,694 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#85
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,353
of 332,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.