| Title |
Adaptations to hypoxia in hydrothermal-vent and cold-seep invertebrates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11157-006-9110-3 |
| Authors |
Stéphane Hourdez, François H. Lallier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,056,070
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
#43
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,680
of 160,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them