↓ Skip to main content

Adaptations to hypoxia in hydrothermal-vent and cold-seep invertebrates

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Environmental Science & Biotechnology, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 120)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Adaptations to hypoxia in hydrothermal-vent and cold-seep invertebrates
Published in
Reviews in Environmental Science & Biotechnology, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11157-006-9110-3
Authors

Stéphane Hourdez, François H. Lallier

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2011.
All research outputs
#3,591,244
of 12,408,864 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Environmental Science & Biotechnology
#27
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,423
of 300,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Environmental Science & Biotechnology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,408,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them