↓ Skip to main content

Joint Distributions for Interacting Fluid Queues

Overview of attention for article published in Queueing Systems, March 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 115)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Joint Distributions for Interacting Fluid Queues
Published in
Queueing Systems, March 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1011044217695
Authors

Dirk P. Kroese, Werner R. W. Scheinhardt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Researcher 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 25%
Decision Sciences 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Queueing Systems
#14
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,266
of 42,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Queueing Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them