↓ Skip to main content

Geology and geochemistry of Carlin-type gold deposits in China

Overview of attention for article published in Mineralium Deposita, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Geology and geochemistry of Carlin-type gold deposits in China
Published in
Mineralium Deposita, April 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00126-001-0242-7
Authors

Hu Rui-Zhong, Su Wen-Chao, Bi Xian-Wu, Tu Guang-Zhi, Albert Hofstra

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 4%
South Africa 1 2%
Zambia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 47 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Student > Master 13 25%
Researcher 8 15%
Other 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 44 83%
Unspecified 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2010.
All research outputs
#3,501,060
of 12,227,808 outputs
Outputs from Mineralium Deposita
#10
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,532
of 275,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mineralium Deposita
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,227,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.